Skip to main content

Catalyst Partners Inc. v. Layton

Catalyst Partners Inc. v. Layton

Ruling
Violation of non-competition agreement did not create nondischargeable debt.
Procedural posture

Defendant debtor filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(b) to dismiss and for judgment, and a motion for more definite statement, in connection with plaintiff former employer's adversary proceeding whereby it sought to have any amounts the debtor owed to the employer as a result of the debtor's breach of a noncompetition agreement declared nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Catalyst Partners Inc. v. Layton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-016