Gamble, In re--Pinnacle Agric. Distrib. v. Gamble

Ruling: 
Discharge was warranted as there was no evidence that debtor intentionally concealed ortransferred property with the intent to defraud creditor. (Bankr. E.D. Okla.)
Issue: 
Discharge; Grounds for Denial.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gamble, In re--Pinnacle Agric. Distrib. v. Gamble. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 27,2018, LexisNexis #0918-020