Skip to main content

Paik v. Lee (In re Lee)

Paik v. Lee (In re Lee)

Ruling
Debt was nondischargeable due to misrepresentations by debtor who knew about or was recklessly indifferent to Ponzi scheme.
Issue(s)
Did debtor know that investment company was a Ponzi scheme so that representations to creditor regarding investing with the company could be grounds for nondischargeable debt?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Paik v. Lee (In re Lee) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 08, 2015 , LexisNexis #0915-115