Skip to main content

Chiaro v. Rathel (In re Rathel)

Chiaro v. Rathel (In re Rathel)

Ruling
Loan debt was nondischargeable due to creditor's reliance on debtor's misrepresentations in granting an extension.
Issue(s)
Should loan debt be held nondischargeable due to debtors' alleged false statements made to induce creditor to make the initial loan and the extension?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chiaro v. Rathel (In re Rathel) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 19, 2014 , LexisNexis #0914-086