Skip to main content

Mukherjee v. Sir (In re Sir)

Mukherjee v. Sir (In re Sir)

Ruling
Debts for "investments" given to debtor who was a compulsive gambler and lost funds were dischargeable.
Procedural posture

After debtor filed a chapter 7 case, plaintiffs 1 and 2 filed an adversary complaint charging that debts owed to them on account of "investments" that they allegedly made in a business venture begun by debtor were excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A). At issue was whether the debts, in part or whole, arose out of such investments or arose out of debts associated with debtor's alleged addiction to gambling.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mukherjee v. Sir (In re Sir) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 26, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-017