Skip to main content

Good v. Kantorik (In re Kantorik)

Good v. Kantorik (In re Kantorik)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor's fraudulent transfers to avoid enforcement of judgment lien.
Procedural posture

Judgment creditor filed a complaint against chapter 7 debtor objecting to the debtor's discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(A) on the grounds that the debtor engaged in a pattern of conduct whereby he fraudulently transferred funds, assets, and earnings to his wife and son in an effort to avoid enforcement of the judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Good v. Kantorik (In re Kantorik) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 11, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-025