Skip to main content

Baker, In re--Davis v. Baker

Baker, In re--Davis v. Baker

Ruling
Creditor's motion for denial of discharge was denied as the debtor's singular omission of a"customer list" did not provide a sufficient factual predicate for an inference of fraudulentconcealment. (Bankr. D. Kan.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Baker, In re--Davis v. Baker Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 20, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-015