Skip to main content

In re Holm

In re Holm

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to excessive expenses for debtor's business and recreation and entertainment of bi-polar adult son.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the debtors' plan pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b) on the grounds that some of the expenses claimed for the benefit of the debtors' son were not reasonable and necessary under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(II).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Holm Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 19, 2013 , LexisNexis #0713-065