Skip to main content

In re Conkle v. Skyline Air Ops, Inc. (In re Conkle)

In re Conkle v. Skyline Air Ops, Inc. (In re Conkle)

Ruling
Issue preclusion could not apply to a creditor's nondischargeability claim as the orders in astate court action did not contain sufficiently detailed facts. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Conkle v. Skyline Air Ops, Inc. (In re Conkle) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 03, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-039