Skip to main content

Peverill, In re--Fifth Third Bank v. Peverill

Peverill, In re--Fifth Third Bank v. Peverill

Ruling
Creditor alleged facts sufficient to infer that debtor's purchases at stores one and two were forluxury goods and were nondischargeable. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; Consumer Debts for

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peverill, In re--Fifth Third Bank v. Peverill Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 26, 2019 , LexisNexis #0619-089