Skip to main content

Walton v. Charno (In re Charno)

Walton v. Charno (In re Charno)

Ruling
Pawning of diamond ring and transfer of registration of business from one debtor to the other were not grounds for denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff United States Trustee (UST) filed a complaint against defendant Chapter 7 debtors objecting to their discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(B) on the grounds that they made improper post-petition transfers with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Walton v. Charno (In re Charno) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 24, 2011 , LexisNexis #0611-064