Skip to main content

In re Siller

In re Siller

Ruling
State court award of fees was not preclusive on debtor's objection as reasonableness had not been considered.
Procedural posture

Movants, attorneys who had represented the individual and corporate debtors in corporate litigation and who had obtained a state court judgment for attorney's fees based on arbitration, moved for summary judgment, asserting the arbitration award was either claim or issue preclusive on the debtors' objection to the reasonableness of the fees, raised under 11 U.S.C.S. § 502(b)(4), in light of the Full Faith and Credit Statute, 28 U.S.C.S. § 1738.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Siller Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 09, 2010 , LexisNexis #0610-084