Skip to main content

Shanklin, In re--Gargula v. Shanklin

Shanklin, In re--Gargula v. Shanklin

Ruling
Debtors did not conceal cashier's check with intent to hinder, delay or defraud their creditorsand/or the trustee as they intended to use the check to pay anticipated, legitimate pre-petitiontax debt. (Bankr. S.D. Ind.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shanklin, In re--Gargula v. Shanklin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 23, 2022 , LexisNexis #0522-064