Winter Leadership Conference | December 5-7 | Rancho Palos Verdes , CA Register Today View Schedule

Crisp, In re--Synovus Bank v. Crisp

Ruling: 
Creditor failed to show that debt was nondischargeable as it failed to show that it reasonably relied on the debtor's misrepresentation and that the debtor had an intent to deceive. (Bankr. E.D. Tenn.)
Issue: 
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Crisp, In re--Synovus Bank v. Crisp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 25,2017, LexisNexis #0517-130