- 11 U.S.C.
Ross v. Wolpe (In re Wolpe)
Apr
18
2013
Ruling
Discharge denied due to multiple omissions and false statements.
Procedural posture
Judgment creditors filed an adversary action against chapter 7 debtors alleging multiple omissions and false statements within the debtors' petition, schedules, and statement of financial affairs (SOFA). The complaint alleged that debtors violated 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A) and (B), and their discharge should be denied.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ross v. Wolpe (In re Wolpe) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: