Skip to main content

In re T.A. Brinkoetter & Sons Inc.

In re T.A. Brinkoetter & Sons Inc.

Ruling
Interest, but not penalties, on late payments under collective bargaining agreement was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

When a chapter 11 debtor in possession (DIP) failed to timely pay postpetition fringe benefits under a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) that it did not reject under 11 U.S.C. § 1113, movants, the pension and welfare funds to which the payments were owed, asked the court to grant administrative expense status to those debts. The court treated the matter as a motion under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9013 and 9014.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re T.A. Brinkoetter & Sons Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 28, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-096