Skip to main content

Anderson, In re--Cadle Co. v. Anderson

Anderson, In re--Cadle Co. v. Anderson

Ruling
Defendant was not entitled to discharge as his level of involvement in the business's insurance needs required that he keep and maintain records for insurance purposes or be able to produce such records, which he could not do. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Anderson, In re--Cadle Co. v. Anderson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 23, 2023 , LexisNexis #0423-066