Skip to main content

Woodhouse, In re--Ceruti v. Woodhouse

Woodhouse, In re--Ceruti v. Woodhouse

Ruling
Statements and omissions in the debtor's bankruptcy filings were not grounds for denial ofdischarge absent evidence that the debtor acted with the requisite fraudulent intent. (Bankr. D.Utah)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Fraud; False Oath or Account by Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Woodhouse, In re--Ceruti v. Woodhouse Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 03, 2022 , LexisNexis #0422-089