Skip to main content

Guice, In re

Guice, In re

Ruling
Anti-modification protections did not apply to debtor's proposed cramdown as creditor wassecured by both a security interest and a judgment lien against the debtor's condo. (Bankr.D.N.J.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Discretionary Provisions; Modification of Claimholders’ Rights.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Guice, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 28, 2019 , LexisNexis #0419-043