Skip to main content

In re Hale

In re Hale

Ruling
Mortgage creditor's application for attorneys' fees denied due to insufficient Rule 3002.1 notice.
Issue(s)
Was mortgage creditor entitled to postpetition fees, expenses and charges?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hale Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 16, 2015 , LexisNexis #0415-034