- 11 U.S.C.
Spyke Inc. v. Zufall (In re Zufall)
Feb
21
2007
Ruling
Stipulation in settlement agreement that debt was nondischargeable was not binding as contrary to public policy.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff judgment creditor brought an adversary claim against defendant debtors, seeking a finding that their claim was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), pursuant to the terms of a consent judgment. Debtors moved for summary judgment on the issue.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Spyke Inc. v. Zufall (In re Zufall) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: