Hudson-Miltenberger, In re--Phillips 66 Co. v. Miltenberger

Plaintiff's request to deny dischargeability denied as there was insufficient evidence toconclude that debtor made a false representation and that debtor was aware that a coguarantor'ssignature was forged. (Bankr. E.D. Mo.)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False Representations or Actual Fraud.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hudson-Miltenberger, In re--Phillips 66 Co. v. Miltenberger. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 26,2018, LexisNexis #0318-040