Skip to main content

Candelaria, In re--Lashinsky v. Candelaria

Candelaria, In re--Lashinsky v. Candelaria

Ruling
Debtors were not entitled to a discharge as they transferred four vehicles to their children withthe intent to defraud creditors. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Candelaria, In re--Lashinsky v. Candelaria Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 07, 2022 , LexisNexis #0222-093