Skip to main content

In re Kirk

In re Kirk

Ruling
Plan proposing to pay attorneys' and filing fees before paying creditors could not be confirmed.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtors' plan did not comply with 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 1325(a)(3), (5)(B)(iii)(I), 1326(a)(1)(C), because it would pay attorney's fees and filing fees in full before any payments to creditors. The Court announced it would confirm the plan only if it modified to provide for payments to a purchase-money auto lender in equal monthly installments without being delayed. Counsel for the debtors objected and for confirmation without amendment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kirk Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 21, 2011 , LexisNexis #0212-066