Skip to main content

Leff v. Herrera (In re Herrera)

Leff v. Herrera (In re Herrera)

Ruling
Additional reporting obligation placed on mortgagees as part of plan were not impermissible modifications.
Procedural posture

Appellee debtors filed separate petitions under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and appellant mortgagees filed objections to plans the debtors proposed, claiming that the debtors' use of Bankr. C.D. Cal. Form 3015-1.1A violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b)(2). The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California confirmed the debtors' plans, and the mortgagees appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Leff v. Herrera (In re Herrera) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 05, 2010 , LexisNexis #0210-098