Copeland v. Fink (In re Copeland)

Nondischargeability of tax debt alone did not justify special classification.
Was confirmation of plan that separately classified nondischargeable tax debt properly denied as unfairly discriminating against remaining unsecured creditors?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Copeland v. Fink (In re Copeland). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 31,2014, LexisNexis #0614-130