Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. Araujo (In re Araujo)

Ruling: 
Discharge denied due to transfer of assets with intent to hinder and delay creditor.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff judgment creditor filed a complaint objecting to the discharge of defendant debtor under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(A).
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. Araujo (In re Araujo). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 12,2011, LexisNexis #1011-057