Skip to main content

Rule 9024

Shibley, In re--Shibley v. SouthState Bank

Ruling
Debtor could not establish justifiable reliance as he had an opportunity to review public records and discover any unpaid tax liens. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
Issue(s)
Relief From Judgment or Order.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shibley, In re--Shibley v. SouthState Bank Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 09, 2025 , LexisNexis #0825-100

Stage Presence Inc. v. Geneve Intl Corp. (In re Stage Presence Inc.)

Ruling
Newly discovered evidence supported pleading of fraud claim.
Issue(s)
Did new evidence justify reopening of fraud proceeding?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stage Presence Inc. v. Geneve Intl Corp. (In re Stage Presence Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 24, 2016 , LexisNexis #0716-090

In re Hunt

Ruling
Debtor failed to establish grounds for vacating court's order lifting the automatic stay.
Issue(s)
Whether debtor had established grounds required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9023 or Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 for vacating the court's order lifting the automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hunt Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 12, 2015 , LexisNexis #0315-070

In re Trine

Ruling
Motion to set aside dismissal of chapter 13 case denied.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Trine Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 16, 2015 , LexisNexis #0215-069

In re Blackwater Enters.

Ruling
Stay of order for sale of debtor corporation's sole asset denied.
Issue(s)
Was single asset debtor entitled to stay of order allowing trustee to proceed with sale of the asset.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Blackwater Enters. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 17, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-035

In re Canopy Fin. Inc.

Ruling
Transferee could not vacate default in avoidance proceeding where it did not supply necessary precedent to district court.
Procedural posture

In a claw-back action by a receiver on behalf of plaintiff debtor, a default judgment was entered against defendant casino for plaintiff's monies spent by two of its officers, who were later convicted of fraud. When plaintiff executed on the judgment, defendant moved under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 to vacate the default. A bankruptcy judge denied the motion. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois affirmed. Defendant appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Canopy Fin. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 28, 2013 , LexisNexis #0313-104

In re Patel

Ruling
Bank not entitled to set aside stipulation for treatment of claim based on later, higher appraisal.
Procedural posture

Movant bank, a secured creditor of a debtor, asked the court to set aside an earlier stipulation between the bank and debtor providing for the treatment of its claim in debtor's chapter 11 plan, which plan was later confirmed. The stipulation's execution essentially mooted debtor's motion to value certain real property. Issues included whether relief was available under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, rendered applicable by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Patel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 15, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-102

In re TP Inc.

Ruling
Consent order allowing company to foreclose set aside to prevent irreparable harm to estate.
Procedural posture

The chapter 11 trustee sought to modify, amend, or set aside a consent order entered for the benefit of creditor mortgagee, pursuant Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1), (2), (3), and (6), made applicable to bankruptcy cases by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024. The consent order modified the automatic stay to allow the creditor to proceed with foreclosure on certain of the debtor's properties.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re TP Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-034

Moore v. Delta Cmty. Credit Union (In re Moore)

Ruling
Reconsideration of order resolving adversary proceeding granted on grounds of excusable neglect and limited delay or prejudice.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the Motion to Reconsider the Court's Final Order Resolving the Adversary Proceeding filed by defendant creditor. Plaintiff debtors opposed the Motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moore v. Delta Cmty. Credit Union (In re Moore) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 06, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-139

In re Garvin

Ruling
Relief from confirmation denied absent fraud.
Procedural posture

Creditor sought rehearing and reconsideration of the court's order approving modification of debtor's second amended chapter 13 plan via a determination that Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 allowed relief from a confirmation order for any reason listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Movant ultimately sought relief from the order based on excusable neglect.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Garvin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 22, 2011 , LexisNexis #1211-034