Skip to main content

Rule 9007

Roberts v. Pierce (In re Pierce)

Ruling
Order regarding proof of claim was affirmed since negative notices are permissible under the Code.
Procedural posture

Appellant claimant challenged an order of the district court, which affirmed a bankruptcy court's order granting in part and disallowing in part a proof of claim against appellee debtor without holding an evidentiary hearing in a voluntary chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roberts v. Pierce (In re Pierce) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on January 25, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-024