Skip to main content

Rule 3002

Johnson, In re

Ruling
Court allowed late-filed rejection damages claim as debtor’s plan was filed after bar date, preventing earlier notice. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Filing Proof of Claim or Interest; Time for Filing; Rejection of Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Johnson, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 13, 2025 , LexisNexis #0825-072

Gil-De La Madrid v. Bowles Custom Pool & Spa (In re Gil-De La Madrid)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly extended time to file unsecured claims in reinstated case where deadline expired during period when case was dismissed.
Issue(s)
Whether the bankruptcy court erred in enlarging time for a creditor to file an unsecured claim?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gil-De La Madrid v. Bowles Custom Pool & Spa (In re Gil-De La Madrid) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 25, 2016 , LexisNexis #0416-104

In re McCutchen

Ruling
Excusable neglect does not apply in chapter 7 cases to allow late filing of claims.
Issue(s)
Were judgment creditors who failed to file a timely proof of claim in chapter 7 debtor's case entitled to have their late proof of claim allowed pursuant to "excusable neglect?"

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McCutchen Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 04, 2015 , LexisNexis #0915-139

In re Pajian

Ruling
Secured creditors are subject to the 90-day filing deadline in Rule 3002(c).
Issue(s)
Whether a bankruptcy court erred when it overruled a chapter 13 debtor's objection to a bank's proof of claim on the basis of its holding that the 90-day deadline in Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002(c) did not apply to secured creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pajian Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 11, 2015 , LexisNexis #0615-033

In re Gomes

Ruling
Creditor's meritless objection to debtor's chapter 13 plan was not an informal proof of claim.
Issue(s)
Whether creditor's plan objection constituted a timely filed informal proof of claim (POC), suitable for amendment by a formal POC.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Gomes Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 14, 2015 , LexisNexis #0215-067

Fiducia v. Jernigan (In re Jernigan)

Ruling
Fate filed proof of claim allowed due to lack of timely actual notice or knowledge of the case.
Issue(s)
Could late filed proof of claim be allowed where creditor did not receive notice.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fiducia v. Jernigan (In re Jernigan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 06, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-031

In re Batista-Sanechez

Ruling
Motion for relief from stay was not an allowable informal proof of claim and late filed proof of claim was disallowed.
Issue(s)
Could late filed proof of claim be allowed or could earlier motion for relief from stay be considered an informal proof of claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Batista-Sanechez Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 25, 2013 , LexisNexis #1113-138

In re Haran

Ruling
Amended deficiency claim relating back to original claim was not time barred.
Issue(s)
Was an amended deficiency claim, filed after foreclosure on the debtor's residence and arising from the same obligation as the original claim, time barred.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Haran Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 14, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-138

In re Dumain

Ruling
Secured creditors must file proofs of claim by bar date in chapter 13 cases.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtor objected to the secured claim of creditor bank, alleging that the claim should be disallowed as late-filed pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002(c) because it was filed after the claims bar date.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Dumain Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 08, 2013 , LexisNexis #0513-139

In re Garza

Ruling
Mortgage creditor waived right to collect deficiency based on escrow shortage due to failure to comply with notice requirement.
Procedural posture

A creditor filed two notices of payment change under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002.1 to increase the chapter 13 debtors' mortgage payment due to an escrow shortage that occurred over the plan period from 2008 to 2012 and to increase the escrow payment to provide for a two-month reserve. The chapter 13 debtor filed objections to the notices and requested the award of attorney's fees and other affirmative relief.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Garza Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 01, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-067