Skip to main content

Rule 1014(a)(2)

Weil v. Elliott (In re Elliott)

Ruling
Change of venue requested by debtor in reopened case more than two years after petition date denied as untimely.
Issue(s)
Was debtor entitled to change of venue in reopened case more than two years after petition date.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Weil v. Elliott (In re Elliott) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 29, 2014 , LexisNexis #0214-105