Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge lamberth

In re W.A.R. LLP

Jan
27
2012
Ruling
Trustee's report of no distribution of funds that were solely owned by creditor and not property of the estate properly sustained.
Procedural posture

In an involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy case brought against appellant debtor, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia overruled objections to the trustee's report of no assets for distribution and denied a motion for sanctions against appellee partner brought by the debtor and appellant creditor. Appellants sought review.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re W.A.R. LLP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 27, 2012 , LexisNexis #0212-092
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

Wells Fargo Bank v. Texas Grand Prairie Hotel Realty LLC (In re Texas Grand Prairie Hotel Realty LLC)

Nov
08
2011
Ruling
Bankruptcy court finding that plan was proposed in good faith was not clearly erroneous.
Procedural posture

Appellee debtors' reorganization plan was approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. Appellant lender sought review.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wells Fargo Bank v. Texas Grand Prairie Hotel Realty LLC (In re Texas Grand Prairie Hotel Realty LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 08, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-129
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

Capital Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Jul
02
2008
Ruling
Legal malpractice claim related to zoning matter was a proceeding "arising in" debtor's bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, the client of defendant law firm in a bankruptcy proceeding and a zoning matter, moved for remand of its malpractice case concerning the rezoning against the law firm pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1447(c) and § 1452(b), or in the alternative, for abstention by the federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(c). The law firm had removed the case to federal court citing jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(b).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Capital Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 02, 2008 , LexisNexis #0708-138
LexisNexis Article
Learn More
Subscribe to %1