Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

western district of washington

California Self-InsurersSec. Fund v. Lorber Indus. (In re Lorber Indus.)

Ruling
Claim by state workers'compensation security fund was an excise tax but not entitled to priority status.
Procedural posture

Appellee chapter 11 debtor defaulted on its self-insured workers'compensation obligations. Appellant California Self-Insurers'Security Fund ("Fund") filed a claim for sums it expected to pay workers injured during the three years prepetition. The Fund argued its claim was an excise tax under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8)(E). The Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California denied priority treatment. Cross-appeals were filed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of California Self-InsurersSec. Fund v. Lorber Indus. (In re Lorber Indus.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on July 16, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-005

In re Cole

Ruling
Debtor who owned vehicles free and clear could not take standard deductions.
Procedural posture

A United States trustee filed a motion under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(1), seeking an order dismissing a petition which a debtor filed under chapter 7. The trustee claimed that the debtor was not eligible for relief under chapter 7. The debtor opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cole Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 03, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-049

Hansen v. Moore (In re Hansen)

Ruling
Debtor attorney denied discharge for postpetition recording of deed of trust in favor of mother with intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor challenged decisions of the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, which denied the debtor's discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a), denied the debtor's motion for reconsideration, and awarded attorneys'fees to appellee creditors as a discovery sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, applicable in bankruptcy proceedings by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7037.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hansen v. Moore (In re Hansen) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on April 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #0707-066

Rose v. Miller

Ruling
RICO action by debtor against trustee's attorney could only be brought by the bankruptcy estate and was dismissed.
Procedural posture

Defendant, an attorney who had represented defendant bankruptcy trustee, filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's action in which plaintiff alleged that the attorney violated 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"). The bankruptcy trustee and defendant, the trustee's subsequent counsel, previously were dismissed from the action.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rose v. Miller Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 01, 2006 , LexisNexis #1206-063

Cogliano v. Anderson (In re Cogliano)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in holding that issue of whether IRA was property of the estate was res judicata due to prior exemption ruling.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor sought review of orders of the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California that: (1) sustained appellee trustee's objection to her claim that proceeds of her former husband's retirement funds were exempt and/or were not property of the bankruptcy estate, and (2) awarded fees and costs to the trustee and trustee's counsel. The lower court had ruled the IRA was not exempted.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cogliano v. Anderson (In re Cogliano) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on September 12, 2006 , LexisNexis #1206-027

Busseto Foods Inc. v. Laizure (In re Laizure)

Ruling
Personal claim was not revived upon repayment of settlement funds as preference.
Procedural posture

Appellant creditor sought review of a judgment of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, which dismissed his complaint alleging that its claim against appellee debtor was revived and seeking a determination of nondischargeability under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Busseto Foods Inc. v. Laizure (In re Laizure) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on September 01, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-090

In re Lee

Ruling
Debtor entitled to injunction to prevent recovery of debt in excess of amount provided for in Korean insolvency proceeding without filing adversary proceeding.
Procedural posture

Petitioner, a court-appointed manager, moved for a permanent injunction on behalf of debtor and a motion to close a chapter 15 case filed by debtor in foreign bankruptcy. The motion for permanent injunction was opposed by a corporation. In the foreign bankruptcy case, the corporation had filed a claim for 2.1 billion Korean Won as a secured party.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-016

In re Phenylpropanolamine Prods. Liab. Litig.

Ruling
Products liability claim against drug manufacturer that was not scheduled by debtor was still property of the estate and could not be pursued by debtor personally.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff consumer had filed suit against defendant manufacturer, and the suit was transferred to a multidistrict proceeding before the court. The consumer alleged that he suffered injury following ingestion of a phenylpropanolamine-containing medication made by the manufacturer. Before the court was the manufacturer's motion for summary judgment, which was premised on a separate bankruptcy proceeding filed by the consumer.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Phenylpropanolamine Prods. Liab. Litig. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 28, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-043

Cornejo v. Channel Lending Co.

Ruling
Court struck a motion to enforce a settlement agreement against a lending company pending the outcome of the company's owner's bankruptcy case.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, consumers, and defendants, lending company and its owner, entered into a settlement agreement to settle claims of illegal lending practices. Because the owner filed for bankruptcy, the consumers sought to enforce the terms of the agreement against the company. The court ordered the company to pay the value of the settlement to the consumers. The owner moved for relief from the court's order enforcing the parties'settlement agreement.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cornejo v. Channel Lending Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 22, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-116

In re Tippett

Ruling
Automatic stay did not apply to sales or transfers, even authorized ones, initiated by the debtor and thus the transfer and liens were not void.
Procedural posture

Debtors, without authorization, sold their home to appellant buyer. Appellee trustee filed an adversary proceeding seeking turnover, quieting of title, and avoidance of the lien's of the buyer's lenders. The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California declared title to the property vested in the trustee and entered an order denying annulment of the automatic stay. The buyer and one of its lenders appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Tippett Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on January 31, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-059