Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge haggerty

Kasim v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly dismissed debtor's action under Fair Credit Reporting Act as non- core and lacking sufficient close nexus with bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

After appellant debtor received a chapter 11 discharge, he filed an action in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon alleging that appellee consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FRCA), 15 U.S.C.S. § 1681 et seq. The bankruptcy court dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction, and the debtor sought review of that decision.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kasim v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-140

In re Or. Arena Corp.

Ruling
Court ruled that the agreements between a city and an arena operator constituted a single, indivisible contract to be assumed or rejected in its entirety.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy debtor arena operator filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11. The bankruptcy court held that several agreements entered into between the city and the arena operator constituted a single, indivisible contract that had to be assumed or rejected in its entirety under 11 U.S.C. § 365. The arena operator and certain creditors appealed that order.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Or. Arena Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 28, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-118