Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge breyer

Heller Ehrman LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Ruling
Estate of debtor law firm lacked property interest in hourly fee matters pending at the time of dissolution.
Issue(s)
Whether a debtor law firm, which had been dissolved by virtue of creditors terminating their financial support, thus rendering it impossible to continue to provide legal services in ongoing matters, was entitled to assert a property interest in hourly fee matters pending at the time of its dissolution.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Heller Ehrman LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 11, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-015

Diwa v. California Franchise Tax Board (In re Diwa)

Ruling
State tax collection letter sent during pendency of chapter 13 plan properly found not to violate stay.
Procedural posture

Appellant bankruptcy debtor filed an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court alleging that the California Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") violated the bankruptcy code automatic stay by sending the debtor a letter directing that she pay her tax debt. The bankruptcy court granted the FTB's cross-motion for summary judgment on the ground that the letter did not violate the automatic stay. The debtor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Diwa v. California Franchise Tax Board (In re Diwa) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 18, 2007 , LexisNexis #0707-023