Feb
21
2020
Nichols, In re
Ruling:
Debtors were not entitled to a stay pending appeal as even if dismissal was an option for thedebtors, the case would still have been converted. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nichols, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 21,2020, LexisNexis #0420-048
Feb
26
2020
Farwest Pump Co., In re
Ruling:
Special counsel’s fees were awarded in a reduced amount as the services rendered werereasonably likely to benefit the estate but the counsel failed to keep contemporaneous timerecords. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Farwest Pump Co., In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on February 26,2020, LexisNexis #0420-028
Feb
26
2020
Reece, In re
Ruling:
Fee reduction was warranted as creditors acknowledged fees and costs incurred to file andpursue the stay relief motion were incurred unnecessarily. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Reece, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 26,2020, LexisNexis #0420-034
Feb
20
2020
Crowe, In re
Ruling:
Permissive abstention was not appropriate as the Tucson Estate factors weighed against it.(Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Crowe, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 20,2020, LexisNexis #0420-025
Feb
21
2020
Nichols, In re
Ruling:
Court denied debtor's stay pending appeal of a conversion order due to lack of likelihood ofsuccess on the merits. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nichols, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 21,2020, LexisNexis #0320-094
Jan
30
2020
Nichols, In re
Ruling:
Debtors' right to dismiss was not absolute and did not supersede conversion. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nichols, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 30,2020, LexisNexis #0320-044
Nov
13
2019
Wilson, In re--Cozart v. Wilson
Ruling:
Debtor's motion to dismiss denied absent showing that the debt at issue did not fall withinthe exceptions to discharge under § 523(a)(5). (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wilson, In re--Cozart v. Wilson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 13,2019, LexisNexis #0120-012
May
30
2019
Kresock, In re
Ruling:
Court determined it was appropriate to allow debtor a short period of time to respond tocomplaint given the strong public policy favoring decisions on the merits, minimal prejudiceto trustee, and severity of a denial of discharge. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kresock, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 30,2019, LexisNexis #0819-043
Apr
30
2019
Buchanan, In re
Ruling:
Discharge order did not immunize debtor from complying with state and local zoningregulations. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Buchanan, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 30,2019, LexisNexis #0719-035
Nov
01
2018
Peery, In re
Ruling:
Debt was nondischargeable as the parties explicitly acknowledged in the marital settlementagreement that the note was not a domestic support order and the parties agreed in theirpleadings that the debt was not a domestic support obligation. (Bankr. D. Ariz.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peery, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 01,2018, LexisNexis #1218-075
Pages
