Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge federman

In re Carter

Ruling
Creditor's objection to trustee's notice of disallowance of claim overruled due to failure to timely object to confirmed plan.
Procedural posture

A creditor objected to a trustee's notice allowing/disallowing claims, which showed that the creditor was to receive nothing under the debtor's chapter 13 plan on the creditor's secured or unsecured claims and that the debtor's real property was to be surrendered in lieu of the entire debt to the creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Carter Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 15, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-052

In re Dufva

Ruling
730 day residency requirement for filing in debtor's new domicile reflects calander days not 24-hour periods.
Procedural posture

The debtors claimed exemptions under Nevada's exemption laws. The chapter 7 Trustee objected claiming that Missouri's exemption laws applied. The issue was how to calculate "the 730 days immediately preceding the date of the filing of the petition" under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Dufva Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 13, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-041

In re Mowris

Ruling
Debtors could not claim deduction for payments on retirement plan loans resulting in order for conversion or dismissal for abuse.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The United States Trustee (UST) filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(1), claiming that there was a presumption of abuse.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mowris Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 17, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-117

Babin v. Wilson (In re Wilson)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in allowing full vehicle ownership expense deduction where debtors owned vehicle free and clear.
Procedural posture

Appellant chapter 13 Trustee challenged a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Arkansas which held that, in determining allowable expenses under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b), appellee debtors could claim a vehicle ownership expense deduction even though they owned the car outright.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Babin v. Wilson (In re Wilson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 14, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-013

In re Weiser

Ruling
Negative equity and gap insurance had a core nexus with vehicle purchase and did not defeat purchase money security interest status preventing bifurcation.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 debtor filed an objection to a creditor's fully-secured proof of claim, asserting that the "hanging paragraph" at the end of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) did not apply. The creditor filed an objection to the confirmation of the debtor's plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Weiser Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 18, 2007 , LexisNexis #0208-055

In re Riding

Ruling
Plan not confirmable due to debtor's failure to utilize disposable income calculation from Form 22C.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 13 and submitted a proposed chapter 13 plan. A trustee filed a motion objecting to the plan, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325, because the amount that the debtor proposed to pay was less than her form showed that she should pay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Riding Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 30, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-086

In re Nickerson

Ruling
Debtors ineligible for exemptions in either filing state or state of former domicile could claim federal exemptions.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 7. The debtor sought to claim exemptions pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(d), claiming that she was not eligible to take advantage of either the Missouri or Kansas exemptions due to the requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(A). A trustee objected to the use of the federal exemptions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nickerson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 07, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-078

In re Williams

Ruling
Relief from co-debtor stay granted where chapter 13 plan did not propose to pay the claim.
Procedural posture

Creditors moved for relief from a stay of action against co-debtors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1301(c).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Williams Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 12, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-011

Addison v. Seaver (In re Addison)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly denied homestead exemption and exemption for tuition savings plan for debtor's children.
Procedural posture

Debtor appealed from a judgment of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, that held that 26 U.S.C. § 529 tuition savings plans for debtor's children were assets of his estate under the former version of 11 U.S.C. § 541, denied his claim to a homestead and individual retirement income account exemptions, in the amounts involved in certain transfers, applying both Minnesota law and the Bankruptcy Code.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Addison v. Seaver (In re Addison) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on March 30, 2007 , LexisNexis #0507-056

Blue Skies Inc. v. Preece (In re Preece)

Ruling
Debt properly held nondischargeable on grounds of fraud where debtor whose helicopter dealership had been terminated held self out as authorized dealer.
Procedural posture

Defendant debtor appealed a judgment of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, which determined that his debts to plaintiff creditors were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Blue Skies Inc. v. Preece (In re Preece) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on March 19, 2007 , LexisNexis #0407-095