Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge rosenbaum

Berman v. Smith (In re Goldschmidt)

Ruling
Trustee could settle fraudulent transfer claim regarding avoidable transfer from debtors to debtors' business.
Issue(s)
Did trustee have standing to settle fraudulent transfer claim against debtor's non-debtor business?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Berman v. Smith (In re Goldschmidt) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 30, 2014 , LexisNexis #0914-123

In re Sagamore Partners Ltd.

Ruling
Creditor that failed to provide sufficient notice of default was not entitled to default rate of interest in debtor's chapter 11 plan.
Issue(s)
Was plan that did not provide mortgage creditor with default rate of interest properly confirmed?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sagamore Partners Ltd. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 26, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-023

Milavetz Gallop & Milavetz PA v. United States

Ruling
BAPCPA provision requiring "debt relief agencies" to give advice favoring creditors over debtor clients violated duty of loyalty as applied to attorneys.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, practicing bankruptcy attorneys, sought an order declaring portions of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("BAPCPA") that restricted and compelled speech on the part of debt relief agencies unconstitutional as violative of the First Amendment, at least as applied to attorneys. Defendant United States moved to dismiss the claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Milavetz Gallop & Milavetz PA v. United States Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-003

Milavetz Gallop & Milavetz PA v. United States

Ruling
BAPCPA provision violates First Amendment rights by barring truthful as well as false and deceptive advertising.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, practicing bankruptcy attorneys, sought an order declaring portions of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("BAPCPA") that restricted and compelled speech on the part of debt relief agencies unconstitutional as violative of the First Amendment, at least as applied to attorneys. Defendant United States moved to dismiss the claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Milavetz Gallop & Milavetz PA v. United States Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-005