Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge gadola

Naper v. Carroll

Ruling
Leave to appeal denial of request for extension of stay denied where debtor could not show substantial change in financial situation between filings.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor filed a motion for leave to appeal an order from a United States bankruptcy court, which denied the debtor's request pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) for an extension of the 30-day automatic stay that went into effect after she filed her second bankruptcy petition. Appellee creditor filed an objection to the debtor's motion for leave to appeal.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Naper v. Carroll Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on October 16, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-037