Annual Spring Meeting | April 11-14 | Washington, D.C. Register Today View Schedule

Western District

Akers, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's fourth amended plan could not be confirmed where plan was not feasible and wasfraught with unreasonable delay and mismanagement by debtor that was prejudicial to hiscreditors. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Akers, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 03,2019, LexisNexis #0219-066

Cassidy, In re

Ruling: 
State court's consent order and damages the state court awarded the debtor created a debt that was nondischargeable. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cassidy, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 10,2019, LexisNexis #0219-034

Williams, In re--Fitzgerald v. Delafield

Ruling: 
Defendants were not entitled to a stay pending appeal of an order imposing the sanction of afive-year suspension from practice before the court. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Williams, In re--Fitzgerald v. Delafield. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 14,2018, LexisNexis #1018-090

Horton, In re--Hinty v. Horton

Ruling: 
Contract breach by landlords did not rise to the level of nondischargeable conduct. (Bankr.W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Horton, In re--Hinty v. Horton. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 21,2018, LexisNexis #1018-014

Horton, In re--Hinty v. Horton

Ruling: 
Contract breach by landlords did not rise to the level of nondischargeable conduct. (Bankr.W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Horton, In re--Hinty v. Horton. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 21,2018, LexisNexis #1018-014

Jackson, In re

Ruling: 
Challenged exemption disallowed where debtors had a property interest in the distribution contract on the petition date which were not exempted prior to the sale. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jackson, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 17,2018, LexisNexis #0818-093

Swain, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to reopen was denied as the District of Columbia Superior Court could determine the dischargeability of the debt without intruding on the exclusive jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Swain, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 05,2018, LexisNexis #0818-034

Minick, In re

Ruling: 
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case was denied where court ruled that debtor's prepetitionconduct in which he had an extramarital affair was not the type demonstrating abuse ofprovisions of the bankruptcy law. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Minick, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 31,2018, LexisNexis #0718-020

Napier, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors' objections to the proofs of claim were denied where all of the information the debtors included in their schedules matches up readily with the proofs of claim. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Napier, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 22,2018, LexisNexis #0618-119

Williams, In re--Williams v. Robbins

Ruling: 
Action of two law firms in placing debtors into a scam vehicle repossession program was sufficient basis to declare fees they had charged debtors were unreasonable. (Bankr. W.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Williams, In re--Williams v. Robbins. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 12,2018, LexisNexis #0318-093

Pages

Subscribe to Western District