Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge stocks

In re Friday

Ruling
Stay did not preclude landlord from proceeding with prepetition eviction action.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a motion requesting that the court enjoin the padlocking of an apartment, which was done pursuant to a state court judgment obtained by a landlord before the chapter 7 proceeding was commenced.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Friday Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 12, 2007 , LexisNexis #0208-037

In re Cutting Edge Enters.

Ruling
Lawsuits by state against tobacco company for violations of Master Settlement Agreement were not subject to stay.
Procedural posture

A corporate debtor filed a petition under chapter 11, and various U.S. states and a U.S. territory filed a motion for relief relating to the automatic stay that was imposed under 11 U.S.C. § 362, seeking an order lifting the stay so that actions the State of Maryland filed against the debtor could proceed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cutting Edge Enters. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 19, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-002

In re McCormick

Ruling
State bar not entitled to administrative expense claim for costs of winding down law practice of involuntary debtor who disappeared.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 trustee objected to the request of the North Carolina State Bar for reimbursement, as an administrative expense under 11 U.S.C. § 503, for the expenditures it made to wind down a debtor's law practice.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McCormick Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 18, 2007 , LexisNexis #0707-108

In re Walker

Ruling
BAPCPA does not provide for court approval of assumption of lease between debtor and creditor.
Procedural posture

Movants, chapter 7 debtors, sought an order from the court approving their assumption of an automobile lease and adjudging that they had waived their discharge as to that lease. At issue was whether such an order was properly issued under 11 U.S.C. § 365(p).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Walker Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-040

Spell v. Longenecker (In re Longenecker)

Ruling
Judgment for sexual exploitation of patient by debtor psychotherapist was based on willful and malicious injury and nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding, which sought to have a state court punitive damages award against defendant debtor excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Spell v. Longenecker (In re Longenecker) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 26, 2007 , LexisNexis #0407-134

In re Strickland

Ruling
60 month minimum plan period required for above median debtors where trustee objected to confirmation despite lack of disposable income.
Procedural posture

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b), the trustee objected to the confirmation of the debtors'proposed chapter 13 plan of reorganization on the ground that one debtor was an above- median-income debtor and the length of the plan period was 55 months rather 60 months.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Strickland Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 13, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-121

In re Crews

Ruling
Car payments not required for debtors to claim ownership allowance in chapter 13 plan.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B), to confirmation of the debtors'proposed plan on the ground that it did not apply their projected disposable income to make payments to unsecured creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Crews Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 22, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-082

In re Johnson

Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to reopen case for determination of dispute arising from postpetition loan.
Procedural posture

A creditor filed a motion to reopen the debtors'chapter 7 case in order to obtain an order requiring the debtors to surrender the title and to execute such documents as were necessary for the creditor to perfect a lien on the title to a motor vehicle.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Johnson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 23, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-105

Spell v. Longenecker (In re Longenecker)

Ruling
Creditor was denied summary judgment on debt dischargeability claim since intent had not been decided by jury that awarded creditor punitive damages.
Procedural posture

In an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy, plaintiff judgment creditor moved for summary judgment, alleging that a punitive damages award entered in her favor against defendant debtor fell within the discharge exception of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) for indebtedness resulting from a willful and malicious injury by the debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Spell v. Longenecker (In re Longenecker) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 07, 2006 , LexisNexis #0806-126

In re Barr

Ruling
Objection to plan confirmation was denied since a determination of an above-median-income chapter 13 debtor's ability to pay and whether debtor's plan committed all of debtor's disposable income is determined under section 1325(b) not under section 1325(a)(3)'s good faith requirement.
Procedural posture

Debtor moved for confirmation of her chapter 13 plan and the chapter 13 trustee objected. The trustee contended that the debtor's plan did not comply with the good faith requirement of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3) based on the amount of the proposed plan payment. The trustee argued that the debtor failed to propose a plan in good faith because, based on her actual income and actual expenses, she had the ability to pay more than proposed in the plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Barr Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 05, 2006 , LexisNexis #0506-040