Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

northern district of new york

In re Bartelini

Ruling
Social Security income properly excluded from debtor's income calculations.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed separate petitions under chapter 13, and a trustee was appointed to administer their bankruptcy estates. The trustee filed objections to plans the debtors proposed for repaying their creditors, claiming that the plans could not be confirmed under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B) because the debtors had not committed all of their projected disposable income to repay debts they owed to unsecured creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bartelini Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 02, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-001

In re Morris

Ruling
Stay lifted to allow creditor to liquidate, but not enforce, its claim.
Procedural posture

Before the court was a creditor's motion for an order (1) lifting the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(d)(1) to allow it to proceed with certain state court litigation, (2) waiving the 14-day stay imposed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4001(a)(3) upon entry of an order granting a motion for relief from stay, and (3) extending its time to object to discharge pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4004(b). Debtors filed an Opposition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Morris Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 27, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-039

In re Glenn

Ruling
The 50/50 Refund Rule applied to cash exemption in tax refund.
Procedural posture

Before the court for decision in two cases filed under chapter 7 Code were objections filed by the chapter 7 Trustee pertaining to debtors' claim of a cash exemption in their respective income tax refunds.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Glenn Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 19, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-022

In re Albert Lindley Lee Mem. Hosp.

Ruling
State's reimbursement claim for unemployment insurance compensation benefits was an excise tax entitled to priority.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed an Objection to Claim No. 179 filed by a claimant, the New York State Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Albert Lindley Lee Mem. Hosp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 07, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-047

Economic Dev. Growth Enters. Corp. v. McDermott (In re McDermott)

Ruling
Debtor's officer's transfer from one corporation to another of which he was also an officer was not a breach of fiduciary duty and did not cause intentional injury.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditors brought an adversary proceeding seeking a denial of discharge of a debt incurred by defendant debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(4) and (a)(6).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Economic Dev. Growth Enters. Corp. v. McDermott (In re McDermott) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 04, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-048

McCarthy v. Nandallal (In re Nandallal)

Ruling
Discharge revoked due to debtor's failure to report receipt of or surrender of post petition note payments.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 trustee brought this adversary proceeding against defendant debtor to revoke his discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 727(d)(1) and (d)(2).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McCarthy v. Nandallal (In re Nandallal) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 03, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-061

In re Adirondack Timber Enter.

Ruling
Bank not entitled to repossess vehicles in which it did not hold a security interest.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and operated its business of planting, maintaining, and selling evergreen trees as a debtor-in-possession. Movant creditors, a Delaware corporation and its subsidiary, a federal savings bank, filed a motion seeking relief under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(d) from the stay that was imposed when the debtor declared bankruptcy. The debtor opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Adirondack Timber Enter. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 28, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-109

In re Lockenwitz

Ruling
Plan confirmation denied due to impermissible bifurcation of purchase money security interest in "910" vehicle.
Procedural posture

Debtors submitted a plan for confirmation. The successor secured creditor on the debtors' motor vehicle filed an objection to confirmation of the debtors' plan and a response to the trustee's motion to determine value of the collateral.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lockenwitz Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 27, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-097

In re Wesseldine

Ruling
Debtors' attorneys not entitled to fees in excess of initial flat fee.
Procedural posture

In the chapter 13 debtors' proposed plan, movant, the counsel for the debtors, sought to carve out certain services out of the flat fee submitted in its disclosure pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 329(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016(b). The chapter 13 trustee filed an objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wesseldine Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 08, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-072

Planavsky v. County of Broome (In re Planavsky)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to determine state tax debt where debtor had not taken all necessary steps under state law.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 11 debtor filed an adversary proceeding against defendants, two counties, a city, and various towns, villages, and school districts, seeking a determination under 11 U.S.C.S. § 505 of the amount of real property taxes he owed. Several defendants filed motions to dismiss.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Planavsky v. County of Broome (In re Planavsky) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2010 , LexisNexis #0410-139