Skip to main content

§ 329(a)

Gibson, In re--Townson v. Sheppard

Ruling
Attorney and law firm were properly sanctioned due to inadequate disclosures. (Bankr. S.D.Ga.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gibson, In re--Townson v. Sheppard Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 27, 2024 , LexisNexis #0524-052

Aquilino, In re

Ruling
Bankruptcy court had core jurisdiction over debtors' motion for review of attorney compensation as the disclosure requirements for a debtor's attorney in a bankruptcy case could only arise in the context of a bankruptcy case. (Bankr. D.N.J.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Aquilino, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 06, 2023 , LexisNexis #0423-001

Digioia, In re

Ruling
Counsel's fee disclosures were deficient and justified complete disgorgement. (Bankr.D.D.C.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Digioia, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 03, 2023 , LexisNexis #0323-077

Quintana, In re

Ruling
Former counsel's application for compensation for post-petition legal services was granted asthe resolution of tax refund and request to incur post-petition debt were important to both thebankruptcy estate and the debtor. (Bankr. D.P.R.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Quintana, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 30, 2022 , LexisNexis #1122-002

Burnett, In re

Ruling
Retainer agreement between debtor and law group was declared void and cancelled wheredisclosure filed by attorney failed to comply with § 329(a). (Bankr. D.S.C.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Burnett, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 16, 2022 , LexisNexis #0522-028

Rosales, In re--Morris v. King

Ruling
Defendant's noncompliance with § 329(a) warranted full disgorgement of attorney fees andexpenses disbursed from the personal injury settlement. (Bankr. D. Kan.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rosales, In re--Morris v. King Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 26, 2020 , LexisNexis #1220-028

Stewart v. Stewart

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in deciding to impose a sanction of less than thefull amount of fees received by an attorney who violated the disclosure requirements. (B.A.P.10th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stewart v. Stewart Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 04, 2019 , LexisNexis #0819-026

Schatz, In re

Ruling
Debtor's attorneys were required to disgorge attorneys fees for failing to comply with thefinancial transaction disclosure requirements. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Debtor’s Transactions with Attorneys; Attorney Must File Statement of Compensation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schatz, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 06, 2019 , LexisNexis #0719-053

Dynowski, In re

Ruling
Court found clear and convincing evidence of debtor's attorney's bad faith and willfulmisconduct after filing cases without being a member of the bar of the court and failing to filea fee disclosure as required by the bankruptcy code. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
Issue(s)
Modification of Plan After Confirmation; Types of Modification Allowed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dynowski, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 28, 2017 , LexisNexis #0417-003

In re Healty

Ruling
Law firm ordered to disgorge retainer paid by debtor in anticipation of bankruptcy. (Bankr.E.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Should debtor’s attorneys be required to disgorge a retainer paid by the debtor, in the days immediately prior to the filing of the chapter 7 petition for the purpose of funding a post-petition appeal of a pre-petition state court judgment in favor of a creditor?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Healty Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 08, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-037