Judge Littelfield

In re Brunner

Debtors filed a petition under chapter 13 and a plan for repaying their creditors. The chapter 13 trustee and an unsecured creditor filed objections to confirmation of the debtors'plan, claiming that the plan could not be confirmed under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B) because the debtors had not dedicated all of their projected disposable income to their plan during the applicable plan period.
Ruling: 
Increase in disposable income during plan period does not require corresponding increase in plan payments.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Brunner. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 07,2007, LexisNexis #0108-130
Subscribe to Judge Littelfield