Skip to main content

Mason, In re

Mason, In re

Ruling
Debtor was not entitled to extend the automatic stay as her actions in repeated filingsprejudiced her mortgage company by interrupting its foreclosure process and increasing herdebt. (Bankr. E.D. Okla.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Duration; Cases Refiled Within One Year of Dismissal of One Prior

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mason, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 11, 2022 , LexisNexis #1222-056