Rose v. Gelhaar (In re Gelhaar)
Nov
16
2010
Ruling
Debt was dischargeable absent evidence of deceit despite state court's piercing of corporate veil to find debtor was alter ego of company.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff creditor filed a complaint against defendant debtor seeking to except a debt from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) and § 523(a)(6).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rose v. Gelhaar (In re Gelhaar) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: