Skip to main content

Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Meadows (In re Meadows)

Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Meadows (In re Meadows)

Ruling
Creditor's postpetition cashing of check postdated by debtor for date after petition date did not violate stay.
Procedural posture

Appellant payday lender challenged a ruling of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton, that it violated the automatic stay when, after receiving notice of appellee debtor's chapter 13 filing, it refused to unconditionally return funds from the postpetition presentment of appellee's prepetition check. At issue was whether such conduct violated 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 and the impact of 11 U.S.C.S. § 549.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Meadows (In re Meadows) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 12, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-109