In re Lee
Oct
30
2006
Ruling
Debtors could not reopen case to file amended versions of deficient reaffirmation agreements.
Procedural posture
Debtors moved to reopen, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 350(b), their discharged chapter 7 bankruptcy case to file two amended reaffirmation agreements to replace similar agreements that had been found to be defective and unenforceable, under 11 U.S.C. § 524. Debtors were attempting to refinance their real property and payoff the existing debts on their home and car.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: