Lazzo v. Rose Hill Bank (In re Schupbach Invs. LLC)
Nov
03
2015
Ruling
Bankruptcy appellate panel properly reversed retroactive approval of attorney engagement and fees.
Issue(s)
Did the bankruptcy appellate panel properly reverse those portions of a bankruptcy court's order that confirmed post facto approval debtor's attorney's employment, allowed fees incurred prior to approval of his employment, and allowed postconfirmation fees?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lazzo v. Rose Hill Bank (In re Schupbach Invs. LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available