Skip to main content

Dieffenbach v. Harworth (In re Harworth)

Dieffenbach v. Harworth (In re Harworth)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in refusing to remove trustee.
Procedural posture

Appellant son-in-law sought review of the orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut, which refused to remove appellee trustee and denied the son-in-law's motion for damages for a willful violation of the automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dieffenbach v. Harworth (In re Harworth) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 29, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-134